19
Jan
09

Artist vs. Illustrator


“On Time and Memory” by Judith Bledsoe, copyright Judith Bledsoe

The passing of Andrew Wyeth got me to thinking about the artist vs. illustrator debate. Shouldn’t the word ‘artist’ be a gift word? It should be a word that you can’t call yourself and that others should carefully choose to use when describing you. Some noted ‘illustrators’ from the past include, but are not limited to; da Vinci, Botticelli, William Morris, Matisse, Rouault, Picasso, Chagall, Dürer, Holbein, William Hogarth, William Blake, Manet, Winslow Homer, John Alvin , Norman Rockwell and Caravaggio. They all worked for money (money really is the defining factor in the argument,) “Hey, Leonardo, paint me a picture of the Virgin in the Rocks, here’s a deposit of gold coins. Let me know when you’re done and I’ll pay the balance.”

It’s been said that the marketing of your work is the true ‘artistic’ aspect of painting or illustrating. How good are you at selling yourself. As noted in earlier posts, contemporary artists such as Hirst and Murakami are brilliant marketers (whether their product is art remains to be seen, in spite of the critics/collector’s fawning.) O.K., Picasso was a great artist–I think all can agree–but wasn’t he also a masterful marketer of his ‘brand’? Of course, he was.

Some argue that ‘artists’ paint because they have to, ‘illustrators’ because they are getting paid to. I feel that an ‘artist’ is a creator (regardless of medium chosen, be it painting, sculpture, music, dance) whose work transcends the banal and illustrates, yes illustrates, the world in which we live–bringing us closer to a truth, or closer to an understanding of our lives. Whether or not they work in obscurity their entire lives or become giants in their field, lauded from continent to continent for their remarkable facility; artists, truly, can’t help themselves.

This would apply to those who earn their living as illustrators as well–if their work is truly transcendent, then they are artists. This is where we, as collectors (and those rapscallions, critics) come in. It’s up to us to discover, uncover, recover, and promote their creative output as significant and worthy of our time, consideration and enjoyment, regardless of how they make their living.

Advertisements

0 Responses to “Artist vs. Illustrator”



  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow me on Instagram

#DogWalk #WeatherReport #harrywinston #Good morning #Oleander

Extraneous Pages

Archives

Categories

Twitter Updates

Copyright notice

© Robert Patrick, and Cultivar, 2008-2013. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts, photographs and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Robert Patrick and Cultivar with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

%d bloggers like this: